作　　者： ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学法学院

出　　处： 《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 2021年第5期151-164,208,共15页

摘　　要： 经验法则是评价证据证明力大小的重要依据。当前,经验法则在证明力评价中的运用模式可分为印证评价模式、盖然性评价模式和混合型评价模式。由于经验法则的运用难以通过法律进行规制,因而无论在何种模式中,其均面临着提出主体不明、射程和推理方式不明确、外部规制作用有限、被告人对经验法则在证明力评价中的运用缺乏救济手段四重困境。对证明力评价中经验法则的运用机制进行完善,要从接纳不同主体提出的经验法则、加强对法官运用经验法则评价证明力的指引、落实证明力评价中对经验法则运用的裁判说理、明确证明力评价中误用和滥用经验法则的救济方式四方面着手。 Rule of thumb plays a significant basic role in evaluating the probative force of evidence.Currently,the mode of using rule of thumb in the evaluating the probative force of evidence can be divided into confirmation evaluation mode,probability evaluation mode and mixed evaluation mode.However,it is difficult to regulate the application of rule of thumb with law.In each mode,the application of rule of thumb is faced with four dilemmas.The subject of rule of thumb is not clear,the range and the reasoning method are not clear,the role of external regulation is limited,and the defendant lacks relief means in using rule of thumb in the evaluation of probative force.To improve the application of rule of thumb in the evaluation of probative force,efforts need to be made in four aspects:accepting the rule of thumb put forward by different subjects,strengthening the guidance for judges to use the rule of thumb in the evaluation of probative force,implementing the judgment theory on the application of rule of thumb in the evaluation of probative force,and clarifying the remedies for misuse and abuse of rule of thumb in the evaluation of probative force.

关 键 词： 经验法则 证明力评价 运用模式 裁判说理 救济方式

领　　域： [政治法律—诉讼法学] [政治法律—法学]