机构地区: 中山大学岭南学院
出 处: 《统计研究》 2009年第7期78-86,共9页
摘 要: 对偶法是基于生产要素价格核算全要素生产率(简称TFP),无须设定生产函数形式和生产要素存量数据,核算结果在理论上与Solow残差法方法相等,Barro等(2003)在最新版的《经济增长》教科书中予以了介绍。国内文献主要采用Solow残差法核算中国TFP,该方法需要生产要素存量数据,尽管国内研究者致力于探索模拟我国资本存量,但无法从根本上提高TFP的核算质量。基于此,本文首次采用对偶法重新核算我国TFP,结果发现,采用对偶法核算我国TFP可行、可信;在1979-2004年间,TFP增长率为2.5%,对中国经济增长的贡献约为25%。 The literature traditionally measures total factor productivity (hereafter TFP) as Solow residual. This paper introduces the dual approach into the growth accounting exercise. Theoretically, the numbers of TFP by the two different kinds of method are identical. Practically, the dual approach only requires data of factor payment and factor price, which are statistically available. Just for its convenience, the dual approach has recently resurged, but there has been in dark in the domestic literature of growth accounting. Therefore, the paper redoes growth accounting exercise by the dual approach. The resulting assumptions, adjustments applied unavoidably in our study and the corresponding comparisons are documented.
领 域: [经济管理]